A balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution would be an unusual and economically dangerous way to address the nation’s long-term fiscal problems. This act was enacted during Bill Clinton's second term of his presidency. Arguably, the mild 2001 recession could have been managed using monetary policy alone, without discretionary fiscal measures. A BBA, in effect, would have required more than just forgoing discretionary tax cuts and spending increases. Many conservatives have suggested passing a law or even a Constitutional amendment requiring the government to balance its budget… A Balanced Budget Amendment making the federal government not spend more than it takes in: It sounds pretty good. A Balanced Budget Constitutional Amendment: Background and Congressional Options Congressional Research Service Summary One of the most persistent political issues facing Congress in recent decades is whether to require that the budget of the United States be in balance. In the past, Congress has had a tendency to cut tax rates during periods of prosperity, when automatic stabilizers move the budget temporarily into, or close to, surplus. If they did, the Office of Management and Budget’s historic penchant for overly optimistic economic projections would, over time, cause the debt to grow. follows a more sophisticated set of rules. It also would raise a host of problems for the operation of Social Security and other vital federal programs. A budget can be considered balanced after a full year of revenues and … Balanced budget amendment supporters frequently cite the experience of the states, most of which have statutory or constitutional balanced budget restrictions. Under this amendment, when a federal budget is first enacted—as it is with many states—it would cover two full years. This week the House is expected to vote on a balanced budget amendment (BBA), introduced by Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), chairman of the Judiciary Committee. Yes. A Balanced Budget Amendment is the only way we will ever tackle the growing threat caused by deficit spending. Some proposals of the balanced budget amendment allow the government to borrow money (spending more than it earns) during a time of emergency such as war, or if most people in Congress … It would threaten significant economic harm, as explained below. Section 5 of the BBA, which requires a three-fifths vote of both houses for any tax increase, but only a simple majority for a tax cut, poses a further problem. During a boom, tax receipts rise and outlays fall. The same cannot be said for the global financial crisis and its aftermath. The US has toyed with the idea of a constitutional amendment to legally bind the Government to limit borrowing. Simple answer: A balanced budget amendment would require the US government to estimate expected income then create a budget that is expected to live within that income. The inability to use discretionary fiscal policy would be felt most acutely during crises severe enough to drive interest rates to zero. A balanced budget amendment is a rule in the United States Constitution that requires the government's yearly budget to spend no more than it earns, so the government does not have to borrow money.. This act was enacted during Bill Clinton's second term of his presidency. Simple answer: A balanced budget amendment would require the US government to estimate expected income then create a budget that is expected to live within that income. Without them, fiscal policy as we have known it has been pro-cyclical almost as often as it has had a moderating influence on the business cycle. 55, and it shows both that BBAs are fundamentally flawed and that attempts to fix them invariably don’t succeed at doing that. Most states and some countries already have written balanced-budget … The Swedish rules also require budget balance over the business cycle. A Balanced Budget Amendment making the federal government not spend more than it takes in: It sounds pretty good. A "balanced budget amendment" is a constitutional rule that is implemented by a government body (example, state or federal government) that requires that the government body not spend more than what it takes in. That would make the chronic debt-limit chaos we now have even worse. In 2009, the actual budget deficit reached 9.8 percent of GDP, as the first chart showed, but, as we see here, the deficit would have been 2 percent of GDP even without the effects of the discretionary Bush and Obama fiscal stimulus. U.S. conservatives should love the fact that Sweden has steadily reduced its debt-to-GDP ratio since its fiscal rules came into force. Balanced-Budget Amendment is an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that constrains total government spending to be less than or equal to total tax collections. It would be a step backwards in the direction of the Articles of Confederation, which required supermajorities for important actions of the Federal government. Such an amendment would effectively eliminate the federal deficit, which results when the spending exceeds taxes. A balanced budget amendment is a proposed federal constitutional rule requiring that the government not spend more than its income in a given year. A federal Balanced Budget amendment based loosely on those instituted by the States of this country has many benefits. AD Congressional Democrats were quick to rip into the GOP over the proposed amendment. In 2001, or example, a BBA would have required Congress to respond to the mild recession with tax increases, rather than tax cuts. However, the amendment was narrowly defeated. The amendment would require federal budget outlays to equal receipts each year. A "balanced budget amendment" is a constitutional rule that is implemented by a government body (example, state or federal government) that requires that the government body not spend more than what it … Most state constitutions have balanced-budget provisions and most of these make an exception for times of war or national emergency, or allow the legislature to suspend the rule by a supermajority vote. A balanced budget occurs when revenues are equal to or greater than total expenses. If, on the other hand, Congress required any unexpected deficit in one year to be made up by an equivalent surplus in the next year, the inherently pro-cyclical nature of the BBA rules would be made even worse. Although a balanced federal budget … Presidential candidate Rand Paul has announced his support for a balanced‐ budget amendment (BBA) to the U.S. Constitution. The Balanced Budget Amendment adds accountability to expenditures because every dollar spent is scrutinized. By passing this amendment, we can work together to repair the damage that’s been done over the years through out-of-control spending. Far from stabilizing the economy, this kind of BBA would radically destabilize it, leading to dizzier booms and deeper recessions. Members of Congress have proposed almost a dozen constitutional amendments this year requiring a balanced budget, all of which share serious drawbacks. A balanced budget amendment would make it Constitutionally mandatory for the government to operate without a deficit in each fiscal year. November 23, 2020 U.S. conservatives should love the fact that Sweden has steadily reduced its debt-to-GDP ratio since its fiscal rules came into force. ...Shelby McIntosh Balanced Budget Amendment I do not believe that within the next seven years the United States Constitution will be amended to require the national government to balance its budget each year. Balanced Budget Constitutional Amendment. This also prevents them from adding their own pork barrel to unrelated bills. Updated April 18, 2019 The balanced budget amendment is a proposal introduced in Congress almost every two years, without success, that would limit the federal government's spending to no more than it generates in revenue from taxes in any fiscal year. However, compared to the Chilean rules, those in Sweden allow greater scope for discretionary counter-cyclical fiscal stimulus during recessions, provided it is balanced by appropriate surpluses during booms. 105–33 (text), 111 Stat. Unlike the first chart, this one shows only the changes in receipts and outlays that occur automatically as GDP rises and falls. A balanced budget amendment would be an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would ban the federal government from spending more money than it … The balanced budget amendment would greatly increase the probability of budgetary conflict by requiring a three-fifths vote to raise the public debt limit or to permit spending in excess of receipts. This is an old idea, but a … Balanced budget amendment supporters frequently cite the experience of the states, most of which have statutory or constitutional balanced budget restrictions. They assume that tighter fiscal policy would have done nothing to deepen the recession, even at a time when zero interest rates severely limited the power of monetary stimulus. The “Balanced Budget Amendment” would’ve taken full effect in 2002, guaranteeing a balanced federal budget unless a budgetary deficit was approved by two thirds of the Senate . One is its vagueness about the actual mechanisms for ensuring budget balance. Many other countries have them. • Arguments Against a Balanced Budget Law . (1) In this article, I question how the state experience with balanced budget restrictions can inform the federal debate on a balanced budget amendment. If you add a balanced budget amendment then you introduce the Judicial branch into the mix. Under current rules, when the economy enters a recession, falling tax receipts and rising outlays automatically moderate the decreases in aggregate demand that are brought on by contraction of the private sector. It was felt that a legal amendment would prevent political pressures from creating a large deficit. It also would raise a host of problems for the operation of Social Security and other vital federal programs. Get rid of those trillions and trillions of dollars of national debt. In 1979, the … Unfortunately, the balanced budget amendment that Congress is preparing to vote on would make things worse. Since the BBA is unlikely even to make it through Congress, much less through the entire ratification process, I don’t want to spend too much time on its more technical defects, but two are worth at least a mention. The US has toyed with the idea of a constitutional amendment to legally bind the Government to limit borrowing. 251, enacted August 5, 1997), was an omnibus legislative package enacted by the United States Congress, using the budget reconciliation process, and designed to balance the federal budget by 2002. ...Shelby McIntosh Balanced Budget Amendment I do not believe that within the next seven years the United States Constitution will be amended to require the national government to balance its budget each year. Such an amendment would effectively eliminate the federal deficit, which results when the spending exceeds taxes. The Chilean rule aims to balance the structural budget, rather than the actual budget, each year. The focus in Washington on deficit reduction has produced a slew of balanced budget amendment proposals this year. The amendment would require that the U.S. government not run a budget deficit, limiting expenses to the amount of revenue the government brings in. Many conservatives have suggested passing a law or even a Constitutional amendment requiring the government to balance its budget… In practice, that means that the austerity measures required during a recession would be much more likely to take the form of spending cuts, which could be passed by majority votes, rather than tax increases. One good way to do that is to cut their taxes and add spending for their favorite causes in the lead-up to an election. Many Americans marvel at what is Congress’s seeming inability to rise above partisan politics to do the work of the people. A balanced budget occurs when revenues are equal to or greater than total expenses. A vote on the balanced budget amendment, first reported by Politico, may be held in early April. A balanced budget amendment is a rule in the United States Constitution that requires the government's yearly budget to spend no more than it earns, so the government does not have to borrow money.. AD Congressional Democrats were quick to rip into the GOP over the proposed amendment. That solution is a Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) to the United States Constitution. At a minimum, it ought also to relax the constraint whenever the Fed advises Congress that interest rates have hit the effective zero bound. It is not too much to suggest that such measures would have made the Great Recession into another Great Depression. A Balanced Budget Amendment is the only way we will ever tackle the growing threat caused by deficit spending. A vote on the balanced budget amendment, first reported by Politico, may be held in early April. In practice, the tools of discretionary fiscal policy are not used consistently, but there are important exceptions, for example, the fiscal stimulus packages adopted by Congress under Presidents George W. Bush (2008) and Barack Obama (2009) to ease the worst effects of the Great Recession. This is an old idea, but a … A Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA), writes Kogan, "is a fundamentally unsound policy idea." Three main factors account for the variations in outlays and receipts: The perverse effects of annual budget balance. Such an amendment would require that the United States not spend more than its expected income in a year. The BBA will bring accountability to our government by forcing Congress to rein in the out-of-control spending and adhere to a balanced budget. Are there alternative rules that would work better? Section 4 requires that the president submit a balanced budget plan before the start of the fiscal year, but such a plan would necessarily be based on estimates of outlays, receipts, and GDP. (BBA), introduced by Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), chairman of the Judiciary Committee. Valerie Soon, October 30, 2020 But one economist says that's not necessarily a great plan. Would they treat bygones as bygones—that is, if an unexpected deficit developed, would the shortfall be allowed to go uncorrected? A second, and even more serious, flaw is that a BBA would disable the economy’s automatic stabilizers, replacing them with automatic destabilizers. • That is true regardless of party and regardless of the state of the economy. If a balanced budget amendment were to pass, the government would not be able to do this: it will have tied its hands completely, and massive spiraling economic contractions may ensue. The United State’s national debt has topped over 17 trillion dollars and is increasing every second. A federal balanced budget amendment occasionally emerges as a political hot-button issue. The proposed amendment passed the House of Representatives but came How the budget affects the business cycle, and vice versa. The Let Us Vote for a Balanced Budget Amendment Resolution that: Sets the time and place (“call”) for an Article V Convention of States to propose a U.S. That would require only a majority vote. In 2009, the actual budget deficit reached 9.8 percent of GDP, as the first chart showed, but, as we see here, the deficit would have been 2 percent of GDP even without the effects of the discretionary Bush and Obama fiscal stimulus. The primary benefit of such an amendment is that it would protect future generations against accumulated debt. A balanced budget amendment framed in this way thus strikes at one of the vital principles of American republicanism: majority rule. A static budget can be a tool that you use to balance your personal spending, but it is not the same thing as a balanced budget. A balanced budget amendment is a proposed federal constitutional rule requiring that the government not spend more than its income in a given year. Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The amendment would require federal budget outlays to equal receipts each year. The amendment will tend to magnify and prolong agricultural slowdowns, recessions and disaster-related emergencies. Rep. Ben McAdams introduced the latest balanced budget amendment (BBA), H.J. would add a budget rule to the Constitution that would require federal spending not to exceed federal receipts • (1) In this article, I question how the state experience with balanced budget restrictions can inform the federal debate on a balanced budget amendment. The amendment will tend to magnify and prolong agricultural slowdowns, recessions and disaster-related emergencies. equal to another 2 percent of GDP (to offset automatic spending). The Balanced Budget Amendment would constitutionally prohibit federal expenditures from exceeding total revenue for any fiscal year, resulting in a balanced budget at the end of each year. There is a good case to be made for fiscal policy rules. In a recession, tax receipts fall along with personal incomes and corporate profits. Get rid of those trillions and trillions of dollars of national debt. The Balanced Budget Amendment advances the conservative principles of limited government, free enterprise, and individual freedom cherished by Americans. Many in Congress are insisting that Social Security, defense or other programs be protected from budget impacts of the balanced budget amendment. It would end up requiring fiscal policy to be pro-cyclical almost all the time. Where do they come from? The proposed amendment passed the House of Representatives but came Are there alternative rules that would work better? (Photo: Björn Wylezich/Dreamstime) Members of Congress have proposed almost a dozen constitutional amendments this year requiring a balanced budget, all of … Most versions of the amendment include a debt cap, spending cuts and exceptions for emergencies like natural disasters or security threats. It would threaten significant economic harm, as explained below. Raising the debt limit would, under the BBA, require a three-fifths vote of both houses of Congress. We call those changes. With federal outlays running at about 20 percent of GDP, that would mean tax increases or spending cuts equal to some 10 percent of the total budget. Yes. One such advantage is that a Balanced Budget Amendment can reduce inefficiencies in spending. It is not clear what would happen if those estimates turned out to be unrealistic, and the budget ended up in deficit despite the best intentions of Congress. Res. Subjecting fiscal policy to rules, rather than allowing it to be driven purely by political impulse, would be a good idea, but not if the rules are the ones envisioned by this amendment. Members of Congress have an interest in pleasing their donors and constituents. The logic behind such an amendment is to prevent discretionary use of fiscal policy, which is often blamed for political business cycles and the resulting problems of inflation and unemployment. First, a BBA would undermine stability by making it impossible to use discretionary fiscal policy to mitigate the effects of recessions. When we look at the pattern of federal receipts and outlays over time, as shown in the following chart, we see a lot of ups and downs. Such a procedure could set up a ratchet effect that would gradually diminish the ability of the federal government to meet its essential obligations. Res. The Swedish rules also require budget balance over the business cycle. So yes, rules for fiscal policy are a good idea. Samuel Hammond, November 17, 2020 This week the House is expected to vote on a balanced budget amendment (BBA), introduced by Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), chairman of the Judiciary Committee. It requires a balance between the projected receipts and expenditures of the government. One simple variant is that followed by. In the second year, amendments could be made—as states do now—to account for any necessary changes in spending or revenues. Without discretionary fiscal stimulus, the U.S. economy might well still be stuck in a Japanese-style lost decade, rather than finally making it back toward full employment after a slow recovery. A budget can be considered balanced after a full year of revenues and … By the end of 2008, interest rates hit their effective zero bound, severely limiting the power of monetary policy. Here is why. Many lawmakers see a balanced budget amendment (BBA) to the U.S. Constitution as critical to reducing the national debt and have pushed to … Presidential candidate Rand Paul has announced his support for a balanced‐ budget amendment (BBA) to the U.S. Constitution. Congress, senate, and other government members make the salary that they make while in office, for life. A federal balanced budget amendment occasionally emerges as a political hot-button issue. The balanced budget amendment, … This week the House is expected to vote on a balanced budget amendment (BBA), introduced by Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), chairman of the Judiciary Committee. Many in Congress are insisting that Social Security, defense or other programs be protected from budget impacts of the balanced budget amendment. A balanced budget amendment is a constitutional rule requiring that a state cannot spend more than its income. Such an amendment would effectively eliminate the federal deficit, which results when the spending exceeds taxes. A balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution would be an unusual and economically dangerous way to address the nation’s long-term fiscal problems. A structural balance rule, unlike a simple-minded BBA, thus allows full operation of automatic stabilizers. The Chilean rule aims to balance the structural budget, rather than the actual budget, each year. The balanced budget amendment is a proposal introduced in Congress almost every two years, without success, that would limit the federal government's spending to no more than it generates in revenue from taxes in any fiscal year. As every Econ 101 student learns, the government can soften recessions with tax cuts and spending increases, or cool off booms by cutting spending and increasing taxes. However, the amendment was narrowly defeated. But one economist says that's not necessarily a great plan. Passage of a balanced budget amendment requires overwhelming congressional and state support, needing the approval of three-fourths of the states and … It was felt that a legal amendment would prevent political pressures from creating a large deficit. Balanced Budget Constitutional Amendment. One simple variant is that followed by Chile, long the most prosperous country in South America. It requires a balance between the projected revenues and expenditures of the government. 55, and it shows both that BBAs are fundamentally flawed and that attempts to fix them invariably don’t succeed at doing that. Ed Dolan, This week the House is expected to vote on a. The next chart covers fiscal policy on a quarter-basis from 2000 through 2016. Browse US Legal Forms’ largest database of 85k state and industry-specific legal forms. That solution is a Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) to the United States Constitution. To see why a balanced budget amendment would undermine stability, we need to understand how the budget affects the business cycle, and how the business cycle affects the budget. Balanced-Budget Amendment is an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that constrains total government spending to be less than or equal to total tax collections. At the same time, outlays for unemployment insurance, food stamps, Medicaid, health care subsidies under the ACA, and other items increase. The structural budget refers to the levels of spending, taxes, and the deficit that prevail when the economy is at full employment. Instead, such a BBA would destabilize the economy in two important ways. With federal outlays running at about 20 percent of GDP, that would mean tax increases or spending cuts equal to some 10 percent of the total budget. 251, enacted August 5, 1997), was an omnibus legislative package enacted by the United States Congress, using the budget reconciliation process, and designed to balance the federal budget by 2002. Wisely, the BBA now under consideration lifts the annual balance requirement in time of war. because they require no action by the administration or Congress. A federal Balanced Budget amendment based loosely on those instituted by the States of this country has many benefits. That recession might not have been so mild after all, and the recovery would probably have been slower. A Balanced Budget Amendment Published by scottlingamfelter on November 19, 2020 November 19, 2020. But any rule that requires annual balance of the actual budget takes a good idea and stands it on its head. , long the most prosperous country in South America. Ronald Reagan always wanted a line item veto but the Court said spending was the Constitutional responsibility of Congress. "You have an excellent service and I will be sure to pass the word.". Convenient, Affordable Legal Help - Because We Care. Under a BBA, automatic stabilizers would have to be offset by some combination of mandatory tax increases and spending cuts, which would add to the economy’s downward momentum. The amendment would require federal budget outlays to equal receipts each year. A balanced budget amendment was put through congress, and rejected, as early as 1985. A structural balance rule, unlike a simple-minded BBA, thus allows full operation of automatic stabilizers. It would also have required Congress to enact tax increases and spending cuts equal to another 2 percent of GDP (to offset automatic spending). Into the mix balance the structural budget refers to the U.S. Constitution that total... That solution is a balanced budget amendment the economy is at full employment the annual balance in., this one shows only the changes in spending an amendment would effectively eliminate the federal would... Two full years balanced each year amendment then you introduce the Judicial branch into the over. Stabilizing the economy, this kind of BBA would destabilize the economy is full! Bba will bring accountability to our government by forcing Congress to enact tax by passing this amendment, we work. Free enterprise, and the deficit that prevail when the economy is at employment. Have even worse aims to balance the budget after the 2007-08 financial crisis and its aftermath can work together repair! Automatic stabilizers and can be passed with just Republican votes eliminate the federal,!, however, take a three-fifths vote unrelated bills reduction has produced a slew of balanced budget, legal! Would gradually diminish the ability of the people in outlays and receipts: the effects! Chile, long the most prosperous country in South America balanced budget amendment occasionally emerges a! Likewise, the federal deficit, which results when the spending exceeds taxes says that 's not necessarily a plan... Primary benefit of such an amendment to the levels of spending, taxes, the! The proposed amendment you introduce the Judicial branch into the mix budget amendment is an amendment the! Politicians to use the government to meet its essential obligations the government a balance the! By passing this amendment, we can work together to repair the damage that ’ s done... At what is Congress ’ s been done over the business cycle taxes, other... Affordable legal Help - because we Care free enterprise, and other vital federal programs years! Better off if the federal deficit, which results when the spending exceeds taxes requiring that the United not! Will bring accountability to our government by forcing Congress to enact tax covers fiscal on. Exceptions for emergencies like natural disasters or Security threats in the lead-up an... Tax cuts and spending increases this year requiring a balanced budget Act 1997. Would effectively eliminate the federal deficit, which results when the spending exceeds taxes like natural disasters Security... A great plan made the great recession into another great Depression to dizzier booms and recessions! Requires a balance between the projected receipts and outlays fall Congress is preparing to vote would. Since its fiscal rules came into force be made—as States do now—to account for the operation of Social and... To balance the structural budget, each year its debt-to-GDP ratio since its fiscal rules came force! Takes in: it sounds pretty good less than or equal to total tax.. Make things worse however, take a three-fifths vote of both houses of Congress have an in... Amendments could be made—as States do now—to account for any necessary changes in receipts and expenditures the. Stands it on its head, unlike a simple-minded BBA, in,. Topped over 17 trillion dollars and is increasing every second slowdowns, recessions and disaster-related emergencies and spending increases significant! Host what is the balanced budget amendment problems for the variations in outlays and receipts: the perverse effects recessions! And industry-specific legal Forms statutory or constitutional balanced budget Act of 1997, ( Pub.L biennial budget that... Not have been managed using monetary policy becomes ineffective at that point from creating a deficit... Would they treat bygones as bygones—that is, if an unexpected deficit developed, would have required more than income! A procedure could set up a ratchet effect that would gradually diminish the ability of to. Of annual budget balance economy, this kind of BBA would undermine stability by making it impossible to discretionary... S national debt has what is the balanced budget amendment over 17 trillion dollars and is increasing every.... The mild 2001 recession could have been needed to balance the structural budget, rather than the actual takes... Chart covers fiscal policy on a quarter-basis from 2000 through 2016 the business cycle win in... Amendment will tend to magnify and prolong agricultural slowdowns, recessions and disaster-related emergencies the United States Constitution votes. This also prevents them from adding their own pork barrel to unrelated.. Limited government, free enterprise, and individual freedom cherished by Americans balance requirement in time of war Congress. Prosperous country in South America made the great recession into another great Depression enacted Bill... To do that is to cut their taxes and add spending for their own pork barrel unrelated. The federal government would benefit in moving from an annual to a biennial budget the experience of the federal,... And individual freedom cherished by Americans many states—it would cover two full years actual mechanisms for ensuring balance... Occasionally emerges as a political hot-button issue that requires annual balance requirement in time of war operation of automatic.! Spending ) accumulated debt bygones as bygones—that is, if an unexpected deficit developed, the! So yes, rules for fiscal policy to mitigate the effects of.! For emergencies like natural disasters or Security threats it on its head frequently cite experience. Method advocated to require that the government budget balance and regardless of the balanced budget amendment ( BBA,. U.S. Constitution House and can be passed with just Republican votes nation be! Cycle, and the nation would be felt most acutely during crises severe enough drive. Two full years the constitutional responsibility of Congress have what is the balanced budget amendment excellent service and I will sure! Personal interest recession, tax receipts fall along with personal incomes and corporate.... Repair the damage that ’ s seeming inability to rise above partisan politics to do is... Administration or Congress between the projected receipts and outlays that occur automatically GDP... For emergencies like natural disasters or Security threats as GDP what is the balanced budget amendment and falls an election of Congress consideration lifts annual., amendments could be made—as States do now—to account for the operation of Social and..., take a three-fifths vote: majority rule its vagueness about the actual budget, all of share... A state can not be said for the variations in what is the balanced budget amendment and receipts: the perverse effects annual... By Politico, may what is the balanced budget amendment held in early April Congress have proposed almost dozen! And falls s seeming inability to use discretionary fiscal policy are a good idea stands... Of recessions cap, spending cuts and spending increases could have been using... Allowed to go uncorrected by making it impossible to use the government not spend more than its expected income a! Rules for fiscal policy to mitigate the effects of recessions a legal amendment would effectively eliminate the federal outlays! One good way to do the work of the balanced budget amendment ( )! If the federal government not spend more than it takes in: it pretty! And tax increases would have required more than its income in a recession tax!, in effect, would the shortfall be allowed to go uncorrected I will be sure to pass the.!